The other side of Peter Vandever

Peter Vandever

Peter Vandever – Missionary, from his Facebook page

I write this post with a mixture of sadness, yet a resolve born of bitter experience, knowing that while the truth sometimes hurts, in the long run it is ALWAYS the best policy.

I wish to share the “other side” to a clearly unique, passionate and talented individual who I befriended online earlier this year; Peter Vandever, but whom I believe to be not presenting himself fully honestly to the world.

I write primarily for the Christian community, especially those who have engaged with Peter and his missionary and evangelistic work in some way. Before I start “whacking” Peter over the things that I have concerns about, I must say that Peter is certainly one unique dude!

He is personable, friendly and clearly passionate about what he does – saving souls, is what he calls it. He is also clearly a man who is an achiever. I enjoyed meeting with him once in Apia- quite a long meeting in which we discussed quite a bit in depth. Not really the casual “how-ya-doing” type of conversation, but one in which we dug deeper into some pretty pithy subjects relating to each others’ faith, past, reasons for being in Samoa, the environment here and so on.

I offered a hand out to help him and support him while he was here, so I have no hard feelings about anything with him personally. BUT . . . and this is a big but, some things do not quite stack up!

The issues

1. Misrepresentation at fund-raising time.

I have watched Peter misrepresent and mislead online when he was located here in Samoa.

Peter has sought financial assistance from the online community for many years (you can see his historical requests for missionary support going back for years) and again on multiple occasions while he was in Samoa. The general pattern is that he explains how hard hard-up, strapped for cash, or unable to continue that he is etc. One of his commonly used phrases is “We are believing for . . .” and then a range of various solutions or budgets, depending on the need that he perceives.

A major factor in his fundraising (as he calls it) was the  prohibitive Internet costs here.

In some communications he even expressed outrage that the Church did not support him financially when they were doing other things less worthy with their funds. While I accept that this was and may be all true, what Peter has not spoken about was that at the time that he was making the loudest noises, I was also offering to help him, yet he never even bothered to spend $2.00 to catch a bus to see the home and facilities that I was offering him.

So just to make it perfectly clear here, while on the one hand he was out presenting a dire need to the world and seeking funding he knew very well that he could have had a free home and lodging, plus good and cheaper Internet than he was paying for but that (for whatever reason) he chose not to even view the offering.

Leaving out material facts is sometimes called a white lie. I believe that creating the impression of dire need, then deliberately asking for money when you haven’t availed yourself of what has been offered to you is deceiptful and totally wrong.

There are other facts relating to all of this which I’m not interested in going into, certainly not online, suffice to say that I am not here talking about one isolated incident or misunderstanding!

2. Confused Purpose & Hazy Calling

When seeking support from others, the core purpose, usually summed up in a vision or a vision statement is normally central to the sales pitch.

Generally a calling is specific and life changing, which represents a testimony that eventually brings glory to God. Abraham, Moses, Paul, David and Christ are all high-profile examples of godly men that received a clear calling and had purpose in their work.

Peter has failed to share this with me meaningfully, so (apart from saving souls) I have no idea what the vision is that the Lord has given Peter. Never once, in all my conversations in person and in all the communications he has presented online have I seen or heard the words that indicate to me that the Lord has actually called Peter to a particular place or ministry.

I have seen him move his focus and thoughts from his country of birth (the Philippines) to the States, to American Samoa, to Samoa, to Fiji which all presents me with a confusing picture. When the price of the Internet (a major issue for Peter) prevents a man fulfilling his god-ordained calling, I question whether or not one is actually “called”!

There is one central theme however – Peter Vandever wants to save souls – and tells the world openly what he thinks or feels.

While this may sound noble, Peter strikes me as a self-professed career missionary with the entire world as a mission-field but entirely lacking strategy, direction or support. In my experience, yes, a Christian Ministry grows up around a man who stands up and is counted, but their vision and calling is very simple to see and easy to choose to support or not.

Peter’s scattergun approach deeply concerns me – for him as much as for his supporters. I see all the evidence of a man who is struggling to deal with some deep issue and that this is being played out in public forum on a global playing field. I would encourage supporters to ask Peter about the calling.

3. Questions

I have questions lots of unanswered questions. Some things just don’t seem to stack up very well, when you start asking questions!

Could some of this be just a little over-zealousness in blogging about himself, or is there more? I think that there is more, but am not out to “get” Peter.

I of all people understand being on the outside, or the edge of mainstream Christianity. In my book, nobody has to justify themselves through any formal training, nor by being part of organised religion to do what God has called them to do. For me, anyone has just the same right to stand up and be a self-confessed missionary as I do to be a self-confessed IT strategist, author, blogger, IT Entrepreneur or whatever I want to call myself from time to time!

But there is a big difference if I then claim to be part of mainstream Christianity, presenting myself as an achiever, a successful missionary, an effective evangelist and therefore by inference somebody special, if I have major trouble with mainstream.

Peter has done this and continues to do this yet he is clearly outside of the mainstream. He does not currently have the support of his home church in Kansas (they have specifically called him to spend 2011 at home – advice that he subsequently, publicly ridiculed and ignored). He has also gone against the advice and wishes of his own Board, the Peter Vandever Evangelistic Association – something that I would consider to be a major serious “red flag” when assessing any situation.

To his credit, Peter has actually not hidden both of these events, but I consider that the way that he has dealt with both the conflict and public rejection of both the church leadership, his own board’s advice (and the AOG movement as a whole) are major factors that funders and supporters should be aware of and explore.

I don’t want to “go there”, because it is not my interest in digging into Peter’s life. I just have questions – that’s all.

My take on it

I think that Peter is probably on the run in some respects, doing a “Jonah thing” . What he could be running from is none of my business, but the signs I see everywhere all point to that conclusion. I just pray that he can deal with whatever he is dealing with sooner rather than later.

I’d also be very cautious about actively helping a man on the run. I doubt that any of the sailors sailing West would have welcomed Jonah on board until after he had done God’s business in the East – if they knew the full story!

My advice

This is the caution I issue to the Christian community:

Be careful and exercise wisdom!

There is another side to Missionary Peter Vandever.

I believe that people engaging with Peter, particularly those supporting him financially, and especially those supporting him primarily on the basis of his online materials such as Facebook messages, email newsletter and various blog posts should do research and attempt to know the full story prior to giving.

I am NOT saying not to give or not to support Peter. Not at all! In fact I have offered to support Peter and help him in real practical ways ourselves. I have also said that if at any time in the future he needs help that I will be there for him, and I really mean it!

I am however advising that we should all be aware of the FULL story before parting with our money and getting behind a cause.

My advice also is to be very careful when listening to gossip. I received some of this before I met him and made up our own minds, rather than just taking the easy way out and believing the street talk. Suffice to say that he clearly has “a reputation out there”.


I may have something wrong, and having only just met him once, I clearly do not know everything about Peter, so do not take my words as gospel without your own research or verification.

Peter has a strong online profile, with multiple Facebook accounts and websites.

He has thousands of followers on Facebook and a few active supporters who regularly engage with him. This gives you a great online resource from which to draw deeper understanding. Feel free to talk with him directly and befriend him yourself and ask him what you would want to know anything directly. He can be contacted via Facebook – just search for “Peter Vandever”.

His blogging over the last year or so is highly visible and I would assess it to be passionate and honest – but only to a point. It does appear to me though to be coloured and strongly biased, missing key facts, and presenting a one-sided “rosy” look at his mission and his work.

His current and past online newsletters are available via RSS here.

An archived snapshot of this archive from today is available (RAW RSS) and (Simplified text).

For the record, I have spoken some very direct words along these lines to Peter himself, and invited him to discuss any matter further. He left Samoa without making contact with us.

Again, as always, comments are open here and I offer the full right of reply.

UPDATE [6 March 2013]:

I have received the following communication from “Author of Void” and I have confirmed that the writer has indeed interracted (at least online) with Peter and her story stacks up well in many regards.

I note that she will mean here Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD, not PSTD).

I stumbled upon a blog about Peter Vandever and wanted to send you this in response because I don’t think you ever saw the real him as I unfortunately have…

When I found this, I nearly shit myself! This insane person you are referencing is a fake – a scammer, money moocher, stalker and violent offender. I was in Fiji (as I see while you two were conversing through email) and while I was there I also befriended Peter. The problem is that he fell in love with me – although I had never shown any interest other than to be able to remote to work through the night while he sat in the same vicinity. All I was doing was being friendly. He passionately fell in love with me, writing a number of blogs (some still online) about how he feels. I did not know this and when I found out I let him down gently. He then began a series of heaving stalking, nearly breaking down my hostel door at times while I hid from him. It got so bad with following me everywhere, cyber bullying, and the weight of being harassed endlessly, that I eventually had the American Consulate in Fiji talk to him. I also had to threaten him and his family – that I would go to the USA armed services and report his neurotic actions if he didn’t stop his bullying. He has a medical discharge for PSTD and seizures. If you call him crazy in any way, even jokingly, he will become a violent raging bull. I was afraid for my life, especially after he told me how many people had killed in Iraq and that he had no trouble continuing. I had no idea about him being a “Missionary” or anything like that. To everyone in Fiji he was clearly a mental health hazard. He never spoke about being a missionary to anyone – NO ONE KNEW THAT! It wasn’t until I went on youtube and found that he had, without my permission, made some BS video about what he is doing in Fiji with my picture in it. He also put a post up calling me a whore and slamming my corporation trying to get me fired. So, thank you a million for publicly exposing him as he has done to countless people. I can’t imagine how he justifies his actions to others and in the same breath call himself a saint.

I have never seen a more threatening person in my life and to find out that he claimed to be some sort of missionary is appalling! He did no “missionary” work of any sort in Fiji… he would just sit on his ass playng with his computer all day and all night – only eating in between. It was strange and just confusing that he claims to be a missionary of some sort. He is nothing but a scammer.

I hope this helps shed some light on your confusion with Peter as you mention in the posts. It’s hard to tell what he is when he lies so much!

From a very happy reader,

I also took the liberty of cautioning AOV privately about dealing with “people who are different”.

I recommend that you be careful though with your handling of PTSD and mental conditions. As you noted, people in delusion usually defend that delusion because they truly believe what they experience is reality. Calling a person a nutcase or crazy or a fraud, or a liar or labelling or categorising people in some way can be a reinforcing act as their defenses kick in and they can justifiably play the “poor me” card. Better I think to shoot straight and speak as you see things, raise questions and let others divine truth.

Privately AOV was gracious enough to accept my words, which was nice!

As I implied in the original post, I have no problem with Peter presenting his thoughts, feelings or view of the world online how and when he wants (even if some of it is fabrication or ‘from a different perspective’ – that’s his business), but I DO have an issue when people mispresent reality for the purposes of collections for missionary work and I will stand for the truth in that regard. I am sad for “Author of Void” that she had a traumatic experience with Peter (she actually agreed with me in a later communication that she has grown enormously through the experience), but I think that her decision to speak out and to permit publication of her experience (“I don’t mind you putting my words online since I know it will give so much more insight on him”) should be seen for what it is, noble, and probably quite brave. I do sense that she has got over it and that her intentions are good.

Salüt AOV!

On another matter, this post receives moderately high exposure through the Search Engines. I have no interest in being a “get at Peter” hate website. I am happy to receive any personal communication from others endorsing my conclusions (or otherwise), but am unlikely to publish them or approve any further comments. Basically I’ve said my thing, others have confirmed my thoughts and I now wish to leave the guy alone.


The Peter Vandever Series:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
This post has 2,768 words.


  1. Peter Vandever says:

    This is first of all, a very direct rejection of clear biblical task.

    In the course of our talk, I said over and over that in order for Samoa to work, I had to come to some type of place that I could work using IT skills. That never happened. From day 1, I said if something didn’t happen, I would be Fiji bound. I am now in Nadi, Fiji enjoying FREE internet while catching up with a month of not being able to work.

    It is people who do crap like this that makes me want to say screw helping the poor with the only hope that matters. I just want to bless people.

    I am at the point now that I am seriously considering launching an IT company with a million dollar vision and just use the profits to fund native flipino pastors globally. I have been having some high level meeting with programmers in database, cloud, and Php about this option.

    I could walk away from everything I have done in ministry over the years and know I made a difference. In the end, that is all that matters. Some people are saved, healed, and delivered because I was willing to be the man on the Road to Emmaus.

    Now, you should engage me personally, not blog publically.

    • Peter has asked me to remove this post “because it could cause me to not be able to find a job for a company in the future” as he is considering returning to work.

      I invited Peter personally to address the substantive issues mentioned in the post as a right of reply.

      His response?

      “I did what I felt was right.”.

      For the record, I did try more than once to engage with Peter personally, but it was only after Peter had left Samoa and had refused to communicate with me that I felt it important enough to write the post.

      For the record, I believe that Christians are on dangerous grounds when the ends justifies the means. Saved lives are good. Healed and restored people are good. Claiming that one is broke, that the Internet costs are prohibitive to your ministry and especially seeking funds from supporters internationally on these grounds when you know that you have been offered alternatives but won’t even explore them, demonstrates a complete lack of integrity and is definitely NOT good, even if it “feels right”.

      For the record too, as I said in the post, I believe that a clear calling (for example to help the poor in Samoa) becomes a matter of obedience and faith. This can be costly – in many ways – especially personally. Convenience, cost and personal agendas should be put aside in a true Christian ministry and when we are called. To my mind, Peter continues to demonstrate to me what I called in the post “a confused purpose and hazy calling”. I have no problem with Peter doing whatever he wants, nor do I have any issue with people supporting Peter, but if the Lord’s name is attached to it, I believe that it should all be done with full knowledge and based on facts – the primary purpose of writing the post.

      Again, as I said in the post, I wrote the words with a great deal of difficulty, knowing that sometimes the truth hurts. Please don’t shoot the messenger. If there is another side to the “other side” then I will be happy share that too. Until then, I stand behind the words written.

      I’m sad for Samoa, but I wish Peter well in whatever venture he gets up to from here on. I readily agree with him that he has certainly “made a difference” on Planet Earth!

  2. Following two requests from Peter to remove his name and photo from this post, I document the following:

    PM – Dennis A. Smith => Peter Vandever

    Hi Peter, I understand your request here, and it is a perfectly reasonable and logical one. In order to do this, which I will consider very seriously, I would however need to see you address every one of the substantive issues raised in the post. If you have learned lessons and have perhaps grown through the experiences in Samoa, tell me about it and I will respond professionally, honestly and lovingly. This may include publication of your response online as a right of reply OR it may be simply that I remove the existing material entirely as you have requested. I would prefer that the post stayed, and that you responded to each point and explained how you have grown/learned through the experience, but I’m open to discussion on this. I would ask that you kindly view the whole post again from the mindset that it was an extraordinarily difficult one for me to make, but that something must have been too important for me NOT to speak about publicly. When you understand that I am not and have never been out to “attack” you, I think you will have a clearer understanding of my actions. I have told you to your face that if you need help, I would be here for you. I meant it and mean it, but this help is not unconditional at your whim. Integrity and humility are prerequisites.
    I’ll await your response to this note before publishing your comment(s). Cheers!

    PM – Peter Vandever => Dennis A. Smith
    I answered them with this [which now redirects to:

    Recently, a guy did not understand why I felt I need to leave Samoa and called me a Jonah.
    I was raised from a young age to care about people and care where they will spend eternity. Being a blessing to people and being the guy who stopped for the man on the side of the road was just part of being me. My grandparents were some of the most giving people I ever met. Loving strangers like friends is normal.
    It is not just something I can turn off.
    To do “mission work” only means I happen to living in the third world, no matter where I am compassionate. Missionary is more about who you are inside than where you go.
    One of the reasons I walked away from being an executive in the IT industry was because of compassion for the poor of my own country and those living on less than I waste at Starbucks. I would spend more at Chili’s in Makati or Hard Rock Cafe than they live on for a whole month. I wanted to help my people hands on, not from a plush office in a skyscaper.
    In the end, I am faced with hard realities. I am a techie. It is just how I am wired. I think in C++ and in PHP. I see things through HTML5 and Java. At the core of everything I am, I believe I can bring change to a hurting world using technology. I am crazy enough to believe that technology can end poverty globally. What an amazing thing it will be to say we can no longer hear “the poor will always with you.”
    In order to do what I feel I was born to do, I can not live in a economy that I am paying on average $500 US Dollars just for internet service that quite frankly should be criminal. It is much cheaper for me to live in Fiji and fly in and out of Samoa from time to time. I can literally go to Samoa and spend a week helping the poor the what I save on internet cost.
    Am I done there? No. Not at all. I will be back and be back often. In fact, I am working on a seminar for Pago Pago later this year.
    One thing I am dealing with I hate being “poor.” I am living on able 12% of what I did when working. When everything is done, I think I will clear 24,000 this year. That’s mean 80% less giving to non-profits to help reach the poor of the world.
    Just to put it very blunt, poor and Peter are not good friends. I am re-launching just to be to travel to countries and visit as well as bless poor people. I want to personally fund helping the poor that we do through our work.
    It is time to go from being poor to being IT poor.

    I publish this right of reply from Peter in full, as promised, but have not published his PM, which essentially instructs me to remove his name and photo. Peter does not mind me publishing the original post – just so long as future employers cannot Google his name and find it!

    Peter misses key points:

    1. The Internet is a public place. He has his photo on Facebook and his wall is open for all to see. He is an Internet professional and uses the Internet extensively (websites, blogging, email, and Social Media) for soliciting funds. He uses the Internet for sharing information, sometimes quite personal in a public manner sharing opinions, advice, and obtaining the same in return,

    2. Peter chose not to address the issues I raised face-to-face when he was in Samoa, and refused to respond to invitations to meet or talk until I posted. That was his choice, but my choice was to speak publicly about the concerns I had seeing as he would not engage. The matter is now in a public forum – removing the post is inappropriate, especially after giving Peter the opportunity to address the issues and he didn’t. Addressing the issues with a right of reply is standard professional practice online.

    3. The issues are still not addressed, in fact not even acknowledged. Peter has talked extensively about Peter, and about the cost of the Internet, and why he left Samoa. My post raised issues relating to integrity and purpose. I was not even worried about the actual reason for why he left Samoa. It’s a red herring. Mis-communication such as this, whether done deliberately or subconsciously, is not becoming of a man purporting to be a missionary, a man of God, and who is seeking emotional and financial support from the (predominantly Christian) public. Obfuscation surrounds my experiences with Peter which indicates to me serious underlying issues. It is wrong for Peter to ignore substantive issues by changing the subject, ignoring others’ concerns and then “fishing” for emotional support when he is called to account. This happened when he left the AOG and went his own way. It also happened when he “missed God” in Samoa. I’m sure it will have happened many other times before too. I hope that it stops. It matters not whether he agrees, because we can easily agree to disagree, but I believe that obfuscating, changing the topic and playing games with life is counter-productive to godliness.

    Here’s an example. From Peter’s Facebook page:

    just had some self-serving “minister” attack me from Samoa because of the move. #gay.

    To Peter, I say:

    No, Peter. I am neither self-serving nor am I a minister nor am I attacking you. I am simply a Christian brother who is asking you some serious questions. Playing the “poor me” card doesn’t cut the mustard around me, sorry! As you know, I have always tried to help you, but my help is conditional, and the truth will ALWAYS “out”. Comments such as these ones that are loaded with contempt for Pastors and anyone who would dare think you have any “issues”, are the very thing that my post challenges you over – where I see you twisting things, probably trying to manipulate others to gain sympathy or funding. I think that defending this lack of integrity in these areas is foolish. As I said to you in person, I pray that one day, when you eventually crash, you may crash but not burn. I also state publicly as I did privately, that should you want it, I will be there to help you as I can.

    Before I close off comments to this post, I will share some of the latest posts from Peter’s public Facebook Wall.

    The final words here are from two of Peter’s Facebook friends (Pastors) and to Peter himself. I think they speak volumes, and perhaps better than I could.

    Peter A Vandever: Pray. A day I alway feared may have come. I MAY be leaving doing traveling work to launch a million dollar company in the Philippines.

    Pastor 1: What is there to pray about? Keep preaching and forget about the million dollar company.

    Peter A Vandever: Bro, I walked away from $100,000 salary a few years in IT. I am sick of struggling with a few hundred. I have had enough.

    It will be an IT company that will do alot for missionarys as well. Like giving them free VoIP service.

    Peter A Vandever: I am in Fiji bro….. alot of things will matter if the right people come together and the right investors. If we can launch a company and I am pulling $100,000 US in the Phils, I can travel and do ministry more often with no need to put up with pastors blackmailing me.

    Pastor 2: Dear Peter, I love you as a brother but right now I am having trouble seeing your commitment to the Lord. You said a couple of months ago that God had given you a release in the Philippines. Then you said that God was sending you to Somoa. Here is what it sounds to me. Either God doesn’t what He wants you to do; you are denying your calling; or you are not committed to Christ. You cannot serve God and money. Even Jesus said that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get to heaven. I would suggest that you really seriously be praying about this. God wants obedience rather than sacrifice.

    Pastor 1: I am sure that Peter often feels all alone in his work for God. This can lead to burnout, which may be what Peter is heading into. Sometimes, a minister needs to take some time off where he can be refreshed. I don’t mean take a lot of time off, but just enough to be refreshed.

    Pastor 1: Like Jerry Lee Lewis says, “That green money just won’t make you happy. Only Jesus will make you happy.”

    Peter A Vandever: but Jesus and that green stuff make ministry so much easier.

    Pastor 1: Peter, perhaps you need to get sanctified, which results in your dying out on the altar of God, so you do not live for youself, but only see Christ. (As you know, we have had our discussions regarding sanctification as a 2nd definite work of grace, which is what we hold to.)

    Peter A Vandever: If you are saved, you are sanctified.

  3. In October of 2014, Peter has again contacted me asking for a total removal of this post explaining [politely] that he had moved on from missionary work and that he was now fulltime web development, and that this post was causing him problems. I refused to remove the post but invited him to submit a formal response for publication. He didn’t.


  1. […] have skewed, one-sided views and thus they develop opinions that actually demean people. Sometimes questionable people do have questionable beliefs. They should stop believing too much in their own views (taking […]

  2. […] previous posts I’ve raised concerns about conman Peter Vandever, initially speaking of The other side of Peter Vandever. Essentially I stated that I believe that things were not quite right with his stories […]

  3. […] engine powers have helped MANY people previously hoodwinked by your lies and self-delusion to see the other side of Peter Vandever. All I can say to this news is, “Hallelujah, Praise the Lord!” There is a God after all […]